bokee.net

高校教师博客

正文 更多文章

过瘾:何亚非怒斥美国代表

姚克明
美国和欧洲国家一样,为了自己的利益,什么花招都敢耍,什么话都敢说,什么缺德的事也都敢干!这不,近日在哥本哈根,美国气象代表斯特恩,又上演了拙劣的一幕。
大家知道,资金问题是哥本哈根气候大会,最关键的议题之一,针对欧盟决定在 3 年内向发展中国家提供合共 72 亿欧元(合 100 亿美元)的气候援助资金,中国方面,严重质疑欧盟出资和减排的诚意。 77 国集团 + 中国阵营主席、苏丹驻联合国大使卢孟巴也愤怒地说, “我坦率地告诉你们, 100 亿美元不够发展中国家的人们买棺材用。” “你们告诉我,世界银行什么时候真正帮助过发展中国家,你们说一个国家出来。”
会议之初,中国副外长何亚非强调指出,哥本哈根会议要获得成功,第一,必须反映世界各国应对气候变化的共同意愿;第二,发达国家要按照“共同但有区别的责任”原则,承担中期大幅减排指标,履行公约和议定书的义务 , 并兑现对发展中国家的资金、技术转让和能力建设承诺。第三,必须确保发展中国家消除贫困、发展经济的优先需要,无论会议取得何种成果,都不能以牺牲发展中国家的发展权益为代价。
而美国首席谈判代表斯特恩,却站在欧洲一边,故意攻击中国,挑起纷争。他枉顾事实,企图洗刷美国在温室气体排放上的历史责任,说什么美国在排放温室气体上没有亏欠世界。并说美国愿意提供援助,绝不是出于“内疚、罪责或者补偿”。还别有用心地说,也不会向中国提供减排援助。还挑拨性地称,中国没有资格获得美方资金支持。气焰十分嚣张!
何亚非拍案而起,对斯特恩的言论,针锋相对,给予迎头痛击。他义正言辞地说:“我个人感到惊讶,当听到美方谈判代表评论应否给中国提供资金时。数分钟前我强调说,发达国家需要向发展中国家提供资金,但这不代表中国要钱。我们是代表发展中国家而说的,我不想说这位先生无知,他受过良好教育。但我认为对中国提供资金的言论是缺乏常识的,若非缺乏常识,就是极不负责任。
何亚非还寓意深长地将发达国家比喻为,到豪华餐厅用餐的有钱人。大吃一顿后,穷朋友到来只吃甜品,却要他平分全餐费用。发达国家提供援助是其道德义务,而非慈善捐赠。何亚非又敦促斯特恩翻阅美国总统奥巴马上月访华时,中美领袖在气候变化问题发表的联合声明。
美国代表斯特恩,顿时傻了眼,给自己竖个梯子往下溜,说:“我认为有关的评论有点令人遗憾,但请容我说我认识何亚非,对他非常尊敬。他是一位很聪明和高效率的中国官员,美国全面支持向发展中国家提供经济援助,我的观点仍然是援助应该给予最有需要的国家。”瞧瞧,斯特恩这德性,这嘴脸。
如今,欧美等发达国家,不愿掏钱为过去一二百年污染大气买单,不愿出钱援助发展中国家,为应对气候变化尽一番义务,已成为阻碍哥本哈根气候大会取得成功的主要障碍。代表发展中国家的 77 国集团已表示,如果富裕国家在谈判中不正确对待《京都议定书》, 77 国集团不排除集体退出谈判的可能性。
现斗争正在激烈地进行着,何去何从仍在两可之间。我们希望哥本哈根大会能够达成协议取得成功,但也不惧怕失败。即使这次会议流产了,还会有别的会议代替它。因为这是事关人类生存的大问题,非解决不可。否则,只能是同归于尽,一起完蛋。我想,前景不会如此暗淡。关键是要学会、要善于和西方那帮视财如命的老爷作斗争。
常言道:“人不犯我我不犯人,人若犯我我必犯人。”这次斯特恩犯我,我们的何亚非犯了他一下,效果不是很好吗。对这种不讲理的人,就是不能一味迁就,更不能示弱或存有幻想。就是要像何亚飞那样,作针锋相对的斗争,使他理亏词穷,原形毕露。这样,他们也许能老实一点、规矩一点。之后,也许能妥协下来,达成某种协议。
但不论结果如何,何亚非这回是扬眉吐气了,是网民们期盼已久的了!我们在对美关系上,有时是该给他们点颜色瞧瞧!否则,他们颐指气使,不知天高地厚。所以,当年吴仪副总理在谈判中,指着鼻子回骂美国人是强盗,就很有气魄、很过瘾、很得人心!所以,今天何亚飞怒斥美国谈判代表,我们说过瘾也就不难理解了。
2009-12-15 15 41

Chinese official: Stern “irresponsible”

China and the US continue their barbed exchange. The Chinese Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei (photo above) says that the US chief negotiator either lacks common sense or is “extremely irresponsible”.

 

unusually blunt language, China’s Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei said on Friday that he was "shocked" by US climate envoy Todd Stern's comments earlier this week that China shouldn't expect any American public climate aid money, and that the US was not in any debt to the world for its historically high carbon emissions.

"I don't want to say the gentleman is ignorant," He Yafei told reporters at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen. "I think he lacks common sense where he made such a comment vis-a-vis funds for China. Either lack of common sense or extremely irresponsible."

The world's two biggest greenhouse polluters have been exchanging barbs this week about the sincerity of their pledges to fight climate change.

China is grouped together with the developing nations in the climate talks. But Stern said that when it comes to financing to help poor countries deal with climate change, the US doesn't consider China one of the neediest countries.

"I don't envision public funds — certainly not from the United States — going to China," he said on Wednesday. "China to its great credit has a dynamic economy, and sits on some two trillion dollars in reserves. So we don't think China would be the first candidate for public funding."

The Chinese official said that China wasn't asking for money, rather that the US and China had different responsibilities in dealing with global warming. (Photo: Scanpix/AFP)

 

He Hai

12/12/2009 02:59Although China has some two trillion dollars in reserves, but there are also a lot of people in China living in poverty, they just had given up their rights of living better to support the country voluntarily.
Every develping counties have the need and right to develope their economies and create better living standard for their people.
China has promised to deal with the Climate Change problem, but it needs cooperations with all the countries around the world, first of all, not for money, but for trust and equality.

LIU XINYU

12/12/2009 03:20Honestly speaking, not only US and China should bear the resposibility for the GW, but all off us should try to find a better way to solve the problem, just quarreling is not the way to solve problem, US and other EU countries are the developed country through imdustrilisation under the emmision of CO2, so because the situation is strict now, so developed countries should show their sincerity to take more resposibility to the developing countries, such as technical transfer、 green funding,ect. It is our own living earth, without it, none of us will alive, and any advanced weapons\reasures\families will disappear like the onshowing movies by US <<2012>>, so think serious about "global warming, CO2" do it now everybody, you are the one!

分享到:

上一篇:

下一篇:业务员找不到客户的原因